- Home
- Software Architecture
- Assess the technical risk before you invest
Assess the technical risk before you invest.Independent, in-depth assessment
Before you invest millions, you need to know what's under the bonnet. Tech due diligence reveals the risks the pitch deck doesn't show.
Signs you'll recognise
If more than one sounds familiar, it isn't a coincidence — it's a pattern.
Tech due diligence isn't a punitive audit — it's an assessment that protects your investment.
Is the software already yours, and you want to know where technical debt is holding development back? Then you need a technical debt assessment.
Why it happens
Tech is often the least understood and riskiest part of an investment. Founders present growth metrics, but rarely the technical debt, architectural risks or fragility of the team.
Without an independent assessment, the investor relies on self-reported claims. But the team is incentivised to minimise problems — not through bad faith, but natural bias.
Hidden costs surface after the investment: necessary rewrites, urgent hires, downtime, security problems. Due diligence identifies them beforehand.
Good tech due diligence doesn't block the investment — it informs it. It lets you negotiate better, plan for the post-investment phase and mitigate risk.
How we step in
We work inside your organisation, not from the outside. Change happens in the code and in the teams.
Code review and architecture
We analyse the codebase, the architecture, the dependencies and the technical debt. We assess the system's scalability and maintainability.
Team and processes
We assess the team structure, skills, delivery processes and engineering culture. We identify key-person risk.
Security and compliance
We analyse the security posture, how sensitive data is handled, and regulatory compliance (GDPR, etc.).
Report and recommendations
We deliver a detailed report with findings, quantified risks and concrete recommendations for after the investment.
What changes afterwards
Quantified risks
Every technical risk is identified, classified and quantified in terms of impact and cost.
An informed decision
The investor has everything they need to decide and negotiate.
Post-investment plan
Concrete recommendations for mitigating risk after the investment.
Independent assessment
An impartial evaluation from engineers who work on code every day, not from consultants.
Do you recognise these signs in your organisation?
How we can help
The services we use to tackle this kind of problem.
Related problems
These warning signs tend to show up together. Explore the related topics.
Tell us where you're stuck
A fragile prototype, a burdensome legacy codebase or unpredictable delivery: that's where we start